An evidence compiler. You make a claim; Vericite searches your actual records for corroboration, scores what it finds, and tells you honestly what can and can't be proven. The timeline is the output. The real product is the verification process that builds it.
Start with a claim. Something that happened, something someone said, a pattern you noticed. You describe it in plain language; no structure required, no legal formatting. Just what you believe happened and roughly when.
Vericite searches your uploaded records; WhatsApp exports, iMessage threads, emails, therapy transcripts, audio recordings, legal documents. It doesn't take your word for it. It looks for independent evidence that supports, contradicts, or qualifies what you said.
What comes out has a confidence rating, sources with line-number citations, and clear disclaimers about gaps. A trust score 2 card says "retrospective self-report"; that honesty makes the trust score 5 cards credible by contrast. The system is strongest where it admits its own limits.
Each source carries a full chain: message sent at timestamp, exported from platform, file line 1847, verified by AI on date. Not just "source: WhatsApp, Javier" but the entire path from original record to compiled card. That chain is what makes it exhibit-grade.
The output is a structured, chronological record where every entry traces to evidence you can hand to someone. Cards you can prove sit next to cards you can't; the difference is visible, labeled, and intentional. The whole thing is stronger because it doesn't pretend to certainty it doesn't have.
Explore a synthetic workplace retaliation case built with Vericite. All data is fictional.
→ View demo timelineVericite is currently in early development. Join the waitlist and we'll notify you when it's ready.
This is a compiled evidence record: a structured timeline of key events during a three-year relationship, assembled from timestamped records including WhatsApp and iMessage conversations, therapy session transcripts, emails, legal documents, veterinary records, witness accounts, screenshots, and audio recordings.
Each entry was built through a source-verification process. Claims were checked against the underlying records; dates, participants, and wording were cross-referenced across multiple sources where available. Every entry carries a trust score reflecting the strength of the evidence behind it, and every source traces to a specific file and timestamp.
Where the record is incomplete or a detail remains unresolved, that uncertainty is kept visible. This is a working evidentiary compilation designed for traceability, review, and continued refinement.